Future Farmers of America v. Romack
District Court, E.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
PLATT, District Judge.
After the Court entered its opinion herein plaintiff and defendants moved for a rehearing in accordance with Rule 59 (a) (2), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S. C.A., and the parties stipulated further evidence in the record. The Court has amended its opinion and made findings of fact and conclusions of law in accordance with this amended opinion.
This action is based upon alleged trademark infringement and unfair competition. Plaintiff seeks to enjoin the defendants from using its trademarked insignia and emblem without its consent. Plaintiff prays an accounting…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Independent Nail & Packing Co., Inc. v. Stronghold Screw Products, IncCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953
- United States Ozone Co. v. United States Ozone Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1932
- Federal Trade Commission v. A. P. W. Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Investors Syndicate of America, Inc. v. HughesIllinois Supreme Court · 1941
- President Suspender Co. v. MacwilliamCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Robert Bruce, Inc. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
- Future Farmers of America v. RomackCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954