Legal Opinion

Scott v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 30, 1990No. 49A04-8910-CV-470PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHEZEM, Judge.

Case Summary

Defendant/Appellant, Robert Scott {Seott), appeals the trial court's judgment against him in a personal property and injury claim brought by Defendant/Appel-lee, Prudential Property and Casualty Insurance (Prudential). We affirm in part and remand in part.

Issues

I. Whether the trial court's finding of fault under the Indiana Comparative Fault Act was clearly erroneous?

II. Whether the trial court erred in awarding two thousand four hundred fifty-five dollars and seventy-one cents ($2,455.71) in damages to Prudential.

Facts

The facts most favorable to the judgment below…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cole Real Estate Corp. v. Peoples Bank & Trust Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. Marriage of Eyler v. EylerIndiana Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Potts v. OffuttIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Evans v. PalmeterIndiana Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Evans v. PalmeterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Erie Insurance Co. v. GeorgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  2. St. Margaret Mercy Healthcare Centers, Inc. v. PolandIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Imel v. ThomasIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. St. Margaret Mercy Healthcare Centers, Inc. v. PolandIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API