Legal Opinion · Dissent

Kalouse v. Burda

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided August 29, 1979No. 61204Published

1DissentHarris, Justice

I respectfully dissent because under the somewhat unusual record I am persuaded that a class gift was not established. I believe the antilapse statute does apply.

I. From the testimony of the draftsman of the will, quoted in the majority opinion, we know why the testator did not list his first cousins by name. It is clear that the will was drawn at a time when the decedent had suffered a farm accident. He believed his death was imminent. The term “first cousins” was used, not to place any qualifications or conditions on the recipients of the bequest, but rather to identify specific…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. State v. SchurmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
  2. Randolph v. Fireman's Fund Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1963
  3. Tamm, Inc. v. PildisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
  4. Anderson v. WilsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
  5. Downing v. NicholsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API