Everett v. . Reynolds
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
It is well settled that the judgment of the court confirming the sale was irregular and not void (Lynn v. Lowe, 88 N.C. 478; Knott v. Taylor,99 N.C. 511; Wood v. Watson, 107 N.C. 52), and it has also been decided that a motion in the cause is the proper remedy to have such a judgment vacated although it be final. Carter v. Rountree, 109 N.C. 29; McLaurinv. McLaurin, 106 N.C. 331; and the cases cited.
Conceding that the purchaser, a stranger, is affected with the irregularity because the record would have disclosed a want of notice of the motion to confirm, we are nevertheless of the opinion…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Carter v. . RountreeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
- Williamson v. . HartmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
- Stancill and Gay v. . GaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
- Peoples v. . NorwoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
- McLaurin v. . McLaurinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Harris v. . BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
- Grieve v. HuberWyoming Supreme Court · 1930
- Harris v. . BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
- Harris v. . BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898