Legal Opinion

Patchen v. Rofkar

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 11, 1896PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from special term, New York county. Action by Frederick M. Patchen against George B. Rofkar, assignee, etc., and Louis Waefelaer, to set aside a general assignment for the benefit of creditors. From a judgment in favor of defendant Rofkar, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

This appeal involves a determination of the question as to the right of the plaintiff to maintain the action as one in equity to set aside a general assignment for the benefit of creditors, for fraud, and to reach the assigned property for the payment of the indebtedness of the assignor, the plaintiff being a general creditor merely, and having recovered no judgment for the indebtedness upon which to base the action. The plaintiff is, and for a long time has been, a resident of this state, and is a creditor of the defendant Waefelaer to the amount of $3,671.74, upon notes given by such…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. National Tradesmen's Bank v. WetmoreNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Tarbell v. GriggsNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
  3. Rocky Mountain National Bank v. . BlissNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  4. Capital City Bank v. ParentNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  5. McAllaster v. . BaileyNew York Court of Appeals · 1891

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dittmar v. De CastellaneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
  2. Dittmar v. De CastellaneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
  3. Dittmar v. De CastellaneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
  4. Patchen v. WaefelaerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API