Legal Opinion

Halperin v. Callender

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided June 15, 1896PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by defendant from affirmance by the City Court, General Term, of a judgment in favor of plaintiff.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAdam, J.

The plaintiff by his complaint, as amended at the-trial, alleged in effect that he and defendant by their joint endeavors procured a loan for one Frank Goldmah, for which the defendant received the sum of $350, and that by an agreement between the parties the defendant was to divide the commissions so received. , .

It appears that' the plaintiff, a broker, discovered that Goldman wanted a loan, and being' unable .to place it himself introduced him to the defendant,- also a broker, to assist in obtaining the money.. The defendant insisted-, before mailing any effort to. procure the loan, that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sibbald v. . the Bethlehem Iron CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1881

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dennison & Co. v. AldrichMissouri Court of Appeals · 1905
  2. Edel v. HillenbrandAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API