Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Kane
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided December 26, 1936PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Foley, S.
In this trustee’s final accounting a construction of the will is necessary in order to determine to whom the remainder of the trust is payable.
' The testatrix died on November 2, 1891, survived by three sons and a daughter. By the eleventh paragraph of her will the residuary estate was divided into four equal parts. One part was given outright to each of the three sons. The fourth part was placed in trust for the benefit of the daughter, Meta Kane Cruger (subsequently Mrs. Mourichon), for fife, with remainder upon her death payable to her descendants.
Mrs. Mourichon, the life…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Clark v. . CammannNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Close v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1909
- Central Union Trust Co. v. TrimbleNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Leggett v. . StevensNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
- In Re the Accounting of Chase National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. RogersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
- In re the Estate of DurkinNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937
- In re the Estate of LytellNew York Surrogate's Court · 1942
- In re the Estate of WilliamsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1961
- In re the Accounting of DauberNew York Surrogate's Court · 1957
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.