Legal Opinion

Duncan v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)

Decided February 14, 2007No. 10-04-00270-CRPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TOM GRAY, Chief Justice.

In our May 24, 2006 memorandum opinion affirming the trial court’s determination that Duncan was not indigent, Duncan was ordered to “request and pay or make arrangements to pay for preparing the appellate record, and notify this Court of the date on which he has done so, within 30 days of the date of the opinion.” Not until September 22, 2006 did Duncan notify us of his belated efforts to obtain a reporter’s record. This, as well as the other delays caused by Duncan’s failure to comply with the Rules of Appellate Procedure, has made this the longest pending…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Peralta v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2002
  2. Duncan v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2005

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In the Interest of S.T.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2007
  2. McFatridge v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2008
  3. In Re ST, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2007
  4. Melanie Denise McFatridge v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API