Walker v. American Bakeries Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtEeyiN, J.
The defendant deems the question of the sufficiency of the plaintiffs evidence to carry the ease to the jury foreclosed against it by prior decisions. Grimm v. Watson, 233 N.C. 65, 62 S.E. 2d 538; Pridgen v. Produce Co., 199 N.C. 560, 155 S.E. 247; Stevens v. Rostan, 196 N.C. 314, 145 S.E. 555. For this reason, it does not assign as error the refusal ■of the trial judge to dismiss the action upon a compulsory nonsuit.
Its counsel earnestly contend, however, that the judge committed error in giving the jury this instruction: “The court charges you if there was a solid line and if the plaintiff…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Grimm v. WatsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Rice v. . Panel Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Jones v. County Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- Rice v. Denny Roll & Panel Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Pridgen v. Holeman Produce Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Huntington Properties, LLC v. Currituck CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Rushing v. PolkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Dickson v. RuchoSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2015
- Pollard v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
- Farmers Oil Company v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.