Legal Opinion

Fender v. Hodges

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided August 16, 1928No. 6608PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, J.

The defendant in error filed a motion to dismiss the writ of certiorari. The motion consists of two grounds. (1) The petition does not present any question of great public concern or any matter of gravity and importance. (2) The petition violates the rule of the Supreme Court, “in that it does not plainly specify the decision complained of and the alleged errors, and does *731not plainly and specifically set forth the errors alleged to have been committed by the Court of Appeals.” The motion is denied. The question presented is of public concern, and is important. The petition plainly specifies…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Guaranty Investment & Loan Co. v. Athens Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  2. Wood v. DozierSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
  3. Gleaton v. WrightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
  4. Kirkman v. AshfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  5. McClure v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fender v. HodgesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
  2. Peterson v. PerrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API