Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Horton

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided October 9, 1963PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harry G. Herman, S.

In this accounting proceeding the question presented relates to provisions for the disposition of a preresiduary trust, the life income beneficiary having predeceased the testatrix. The position of the executor is that this legacy lapsed and passed into the residuary estate. The remainderman contends that there is no lapse and that the remainder is now payable to her.

The pertinent provisions of the will are:

“ third: I give and bequeath out of my estate the sum of two thousand ($2,000.) dollars to jane danielson, a grand-daughter of my sister-in-law, jennie k. landon, in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States Trust Co. v. HogencampNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  2. Keefe v. KeefeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
  3. Keefe v. KeefeNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  4. In re the Estate of ChristieNew York Surrogate's Court · 1927
  5. In re the Estate of KennedyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1961

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of ThallNew York Surrogate's Court · 1964
  2. In re the Estate of RolstonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API