Legal Opinion

State v. Crisp

Montana Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1991No. 90-593PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hunt

A jury impaneled in the Thirteenth Judicial District Court, Yellowstone County, found defendant and appellant, Randall Crisp, guilty of one count of criminal endangerment, a felony. Defendant appeals. We affirm.

The following issues are raised on appeal:

1. Is § 45-5-207, MCA, which defines criminal endangerment, unconstitutionally vague?

2. Did the District Court err in refusing defendant’s instruction defining “substantial risk of death”?

Defendant and Renae Yancey had lived together off and on for five years. On March 16, 1990, they were living in an area of Billings known as Lockwood. They…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. City of Whitefish v. O'SHAUGHNESSYMontana Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State v. CamitschMontana Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State v. GouldMontana Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State v. WoodsMontana Supreme Court · 1986
  5. City of Choteau v. JoslynMontana Supreme Court · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. GuillaumeMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. MartelMontana Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. NyeMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. HocevarMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State v. LambertMontana Supreme Court · 1996

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API