Legal Opinion

In re Chang

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 13, 2008PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*152OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Respondent Wild Chang was admitted to the practice of law in the State of New York by the First Judicial Department on June 7, 1982. Although he does not maintain an office in New York, he has remained current in his New York attorney registration. Respondent was also admitted to practice law in Massachusetts in 1989. Respondent maintains a law office in California although not admitted to the bar of that state.

The Departmental Disciplinary Committee now seeks an order, pursuant to 22 NYCRR 603.3, suspending respondent from the practice of law for one year predicated upon…

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In re ReissAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  2. In re HoffmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. In re PowerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  4. In re LeavittAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  5. In re NuzzoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re SirkinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. In re JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  3. Matter of ZiankovichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
  4. In re SirkinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  5. Matter of GotimerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API