Legal Opinion

Braverman v. Braverman

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided October 4, 1943No. Docket 149/408PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Complainant seeks an injunction pendente lite restraining defendant from prosecuting an action at law. He entered into a contract with defendant by which he agreed to purchase stock of a corporation, and to pay therefor in installments at the rate of $25 a week. The contract contained an acceleration clause providing that in case of default in making the payments, the vendor had the right to demand payment of the entire balance due. The stock was placed in escrow with two custodians pending the completion of the transaction. Complainant defaulted and defendant demanded payment in accordance…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cahill v. BelliNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1946
  2. Tidaback v. RudeNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API