Legal Opinion

Traffenstedt v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided February 1, 1949No. 7 Div. 970PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARR, Judge.

The defendant below was charged in art indictment containing two counts, (1) manufacturing prohibited liquor, (2) possessing an illegal still.

Count one was eliminated by the general affirmative charge. A conviction followed under the remaining count.

We take the following from the brief of the Assistant Attorney General:

“The evidence introduced on behalf of the State tended to show that the accused and Paul Dunn were exercising dominion over and control of an alleged still located on the property of another. At about daybreak one day in July, they lifted the lid off the still and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Freeman v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1941
  2. Abercrombie v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1948
  3. Graham v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  4. Davis v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1931
  5. Jennings v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1916

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1953
  2. Ellis v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1955
  3. Windham v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1950
  4. Hall v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1952
  5. Mooneyham v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1951

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API