Legal Opinion

McDonald v. Conway

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 12, 1926PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWait, J.

The plaintiff and the defendant owned adj pining premises whose northerly boundary line extended a distance of about one hundred and sixty-seven feet from Pearl Street Court to Spring Street in Springfield. Neither lot abutted on Winter Street, a public highway which then ran into but did not cross Pearl Street Place. Early in 1924, a project was under consideration to extend Winter Street easterly to Spring Street, north of the lots of the plaintiff and defendant, and an agreement had been signed by the defendant and others who described themselves therein as "owners of property abutting on…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Howe v. HoweMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  2. Bourke v. CallananMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
  3. Fickett v. DurhamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
  4. Kennerson v. NashMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  5. Rolikatis v. LovettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cann v. BarryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  2. Ravosa v. ZaisMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1996
  3. Berenson v. NirensteinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
  4. Beacon Oil Co. v. ManiatisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  5. Carroll v. MarkeyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API