Legal Opinion

Bronx Metal Bed Co. v. Wallerstein

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided November 12, 1903PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Fourth District. Action by the Bronx Metal Bed Company against Samuel Wallerstein and one Warshansky. From a judgment for defendant Warshanslcy, plaintiff appeals. Reversed.

1Opinion of the CourtFreedman, P. J.

The plaintiff sold and delivered goods to the defendants, who were copartners. Subsequently such copartnership was dissolved by mutual agreement, and the defendant Wallerstein,; for a good consideration as between himself and his copartner, agreed to pay the firm debts.. "The question in the case was whether the plaintiff had released the defendant Warshansky, the retiring partner. The trial court decided that question in favor of Warshansky, gave a judgment in his favor against the plaintiff for costs, and in favor of the plaintiff against the defendant Wallerstein for the amount of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fowler v. CokerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  2. Backus v. . FobesNew York Court of Appeals · 1859

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Isaac Goldman Co. v. WilkesAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API