Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bruns v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1941No. L. A. 17850Published

1Dissent

CARTER, J., Dissenting.

I dissent.

While the facts found by the local administrative committee with reference to the misrepresentation made by petitioner that he had filed an action on behalf of his client when he had not done so, and his failure to render an accounting of money received by him in trust are sufficient to justify disciplinary action against him, I cannot agree with the holding in the majority opinion that a member of the bar can be subjected to a disciplinary proceeding for mere negligent conduct.

I still hold to the views expressed by me in my dissenting opinions in the cases of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Trusty v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. In Re McKennaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API