Legal Opinion

State v. Scott

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 22, 1994No. 93-1468PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDREASEN, Justice.

John Scott was charged with the crime of possession of a controlled substance, marijuana. He filed a motion to suppress evidence seized by a police officer from his pocket during a pat-down search. Iowa R.Crim.P. 11(1). The district court granted his motion finding that the scope of the pat-down search went beyond that permitted under Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968), and that the officer’s inquiry as to what was in his pocket at the time of the search constituted “custodial interrogation” prohibited by the doctrine enunciated in Miranda v.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Minnesota v. DickersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State v. CountrymanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1997
  2. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
  3. Des Moines Register & Tribune Co. v. DwyerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
  4. State v. GaySupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
  5. State v. HavilandSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API