Legal Opinion

Tantillo v. U. S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 15, 1989PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Judgment unanimously reversed on the law without costs and summary judgment granted in favor of defendant U. S. Fidelity and Guaranty Company, in accordance with the following *971memorandum: The policy of liability insurance issued by defendant, U. S. Fidelity and Guaranty Company, to plaintiff, Joseph Tantillo, was effectively canceled on December 28, 1983 for Tantillo’s failure to pay the premiums. Three months after the date of cancellation, Michael Kwiatkowski suffered burns which he alleged were caused by Tantillo’s negligent installation of a hot water heating system in his home.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bourne v. SealAppellate Court of Illinois · 1964
  2. Nassau Insurance v. ManzioneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. Van Buren v. Employers Insurance of WausauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Merchants Mutual Insurance Group v. Travelers InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. Commissioners of the State Insurance Fund v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  3. Jadwiga Realty, Inc. v. General Accident Insurance of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  4. Holowacz v. Insurance of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API