Leeman v. Public Utilities Commission of D. of C.
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
HOLTZOFF, District Judge.
These are three appeals from -orders of the Public Utilities Commission of the District of Columbia increasing rates for electric power furnished by the Potomac Electric Power Company. Each of the appellants is a consumer and claims that the increases granted by the Commission are not warranted. The appeals were consolidated for hearing.
These appeals are taken pursuant to a statute, D.C.Code, 1940 Ed., Title 43, Section 705, which confers on the United States District Court for the District of Columbia jurisdiction to hear and determine any -appeal from an order or…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Smyth v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- The Minnesota Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Smyth v. Ames; Smyth v. Smith; Smyth v. HigginsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Virginian Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Capital Transit Co. v. Public Utilities Commission of District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
- Leonard S. Goodman v. Public Service Commission of the District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- State Ex Rel. Allied Daily Newspapers v. Washington Public Service CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1953
- King v. Public Service CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Petition of Fryeburg Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1955
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.