Leisure v. Hogan

*278Linda Leisure, an Ohio resident proceeding pro se, appeals a district court order dismissing her petition for a writ of mandamus, construed as a complaint, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(1), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).

Leisure, a self-styled whistleblower, filed this action alleging that Judge Daniel T. Hogan has engaged in conduct contrary to the law. Judge Hogan filed a motion to dismiss, pursuant to…