Seneca Nation of Indians v. Brucker
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
McGARRAGHY, District Judge.
This is an action to enjoin the Secretary of the Army and the Chief of the United States Army Corps of Engineers from commencing the construction of a flood control dam intended, primarily, for the protection of Pittsburgh, in the Allegheny River in the vicinity of Kinzua, Pennsylvania, the project being officially designated as “the Allegheny Reservoir Project” which is approximately twelve and one-half miles downstream from the Pennsylvania-New York border.
Within the area of the project is part of a reservation which was the subject of a treaty between the Seneca…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Lone Wolf v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Cherokee Nation v. Southern Kansas Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Bragg v. WeaverSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- United States v. Great Falls Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Elk v. WilkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Julia Nicodemus and R. H. Spencer v. Washington Water Power Company, a Corporation, United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- United States v. 5,677.94 ACRES OF LAND, ETC.District Court, D. Montana · 1958
- United States v. 40 Acres of LandDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1958