Legal Opinion

Bernstein v. Bernstein

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1931PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHammer, J.

By order of this court dated and entered April 29, 1931, it has been adjudicated “ that defendant has never been served with any papers as required by law to bring him into contempt.” This order was entered upon the granting on April 20, 1931, of the motion of April 6, 1931, to vacate and set aside a previous order which adjudged the defendant guilty of contempt for failure to pay alimony pendente lité awarded herein by order entered October 10, 1930.

This motion, brought by order to show cause dated April 23, 1931 — returnable April 27, 1931 — is to stay the trial of the action “ for failure…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Harney v. HarneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  2. Fennessy v. FennessyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  3. Gray v. GrayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
  4. Knott v. KnottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  5. Friedman v. FriedmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Clarke v. ClarkeNew York Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Doré v. DoréNew York Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Clarke v. ClarkeNew York Supreme Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API