Legal Opinion

Seeley v. Park

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1975No. 13643PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ELLETT, Justice:

The question presented by this ^ppeal is whether or not the statute of limitation applies to past due unpaid installments under a divorce decree.

The parties hereto were divorced in October, 1959. The plaintiff was awarded custody of a minor child, and the defendant was ordered to pay plaintiff the sum of $40 per month as support money for the child.

The present controversy was initiated by an order to show cause why the defendant should not be held in contempt for his failure to pay support money. His arrearage is in the amount of $5,800, being for twelve years and one month.

The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Simmons v. SimmonsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Openshaw v. OpenshawUtah Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Beesley v. BadgerUtah Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Griffin v. AverySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
  2. Britton v. BrittonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1983
  3. In Re the Marriage of HooperMontana Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Carter v. CarterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
  5. Johnson v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API