Legal Opinion

Pua v. Lam

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 16, 2017No. 4985N 154527/14PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan M. Kenney, J.), entered on or about September 28, 2016, which denied defendant C&H Herb Shop, Inc.’s motion to, among other things, vacate the note of issue and extend its time to make summary judgment motions to 120 days following the completion of discovery, unanimously reversed, on the law, on the facts, and in the exercise of discretion, and the motion granted, with costs.

When, as in this case, statements in a certificate of readiness concerning completion of discovery are incorrect or blatantly false, a motion to strike the note of issue should…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Walker v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. Cromer v. YellenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ruiz v. Park Gramercy Owners Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
  2. Michael R. Gianatasio, PE, P.C. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API