Legal Opinion

Cook v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided December 31, 1958No. A-12651PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POWELL, Judge.

Homer Wilson Cook, plaintiff in error, was charged in the district court of Tulsa county with the crime of indecent exposure and found guilty by a jury, who left the punishment to be assessed by the court. In conformity with the verdict, the court fixed the penalty at three years in the State Penitentiary. Appeal has been duly perfected to this court.

For reversal, plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as defendant, in brief advances two propositions of error. No contention is made that the allegations of the information were not sufficient.

In his first proposition, the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Carr v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1950
  2. Leeth v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1951
  3. Lincoln v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1948
  4. Powell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1949
  5. Wehr v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1945

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ramirez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1967
  2. Fritz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1976
  3. Beck v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1984
  4. Cook v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API