Legal Opinion

People v. McDonald

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 10, 1992No. 2-90-0835PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Nickels

After a trial in absentia, defendant was convicted of possession of a controlled substance with the intent to deliver (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1987, ch. 56V2, par. 1401) and, also in absentia, was sentenced to 10 years’ imprisonment. Defendant appeals, asserting that: (1) the trial court abused its discretion in denying defendant’s counsel’s request for a continuance; (2) the trial court failed to comply with the statutory requirement for a trial in absentia-, (3) the trial court’s explanation of defendant’s absence during voir dire confused the jury in light of the trial court’s later admission of…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. People v. EnochIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  3. People v. YoungIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Carter v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. People v. StreitIllinois Supreme Court · 1991

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. RobinsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  2. People v. DanielsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  3. People v. StormsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  4. People v. BradfordAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  5. People v. PontilloAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API