People v. McDonald
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Nickels
After a trial in absentia, defendant was convicted of possession of a controlled substance with the intent to deliver (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1987, ch. 56V2, par. 1401) and, also in absentia, was sentenced to 10 years’ imprisonment. Defendant appeals, asserting that: (1) the trial court abused its discretion in denying defendant’s counsel’s request for a continuance; (2) the trial court failed to comply with the statutory requirement for a trial in absentia-, (3) the trial court’s explanation of defendant’s absence during voir dire confused the jury in light of the trial court’s later admission of…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- People v. EnochIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
- People v. YoungIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
- Carter v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- People v. StreitIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- People v. RobinsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. DanielsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
- People v. StormsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
- People v. BradfordAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
- People v. PontilloAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.