General Building Supply Corp. v. State
New York Court of Claims
1Opinion of the CourtAlexander Del G-iorno, J.
Claimants by this motion seek leave to examine the State through a particular person, namely Mr. James Rodetis, as to all evidence material and necessary to the prosecution of this claim. The State, in opposition, contends that as Mr. Rodetis is not one of its employees nor within the control of the State, said motion should be denied.
An earlier examination before trial was held on January 15, 1970, at which time the State produced as its witness Mr. Jerome D ’Amaro who testified in substance, as set forth in the affirmation in support of motion filed by claimants ’ attorney, as follows: that…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Gates v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1972
- Tavormina v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1984