Legal Opinion

Richardson v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 22, 1902No. 2596PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Ho statement required.

1Opinion of the Court

HENDERSON, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of incest, and his punishment assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for a'term of two years.

Appellant’s first bill of exceptions is to the action of the court permitting the county attorney in his argument to allude to the fact that appellant’s wife was presented, summoned by the State, and sworn, and defendant did not introduce her as a witness. Under the circumstances of this case, as detailed by the witnesses, if' appellant was innocent his wife would,have been a material witness for him; and it was therefore permissible for the State to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hamlin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
  2. Barth v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
  3. Kilpatrick v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
  2. Eads v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914
  3. Bost v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
  4. Weaver v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1935
  5. Baum v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API