Legal Opinion

Camel v. Harmon

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 2, 2005No. 04-1437PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

hAMY, Judge.

The plaintiffs filed suit seeking compensation for repairs they alleged were necessary to a house purchased from the defendants. Although the sale was “as is,” the plaintiffs asserted that certain measures had been taken preventing the discovery of damages to the house. A default judgment was confirmed, with the trial court awarding $39,646.51 in damages as well as attorney’s fees. A motion for new trial was denied. For the following reasons, the judgment of the trial court is vacated and set aside. The matter is remanded for further proceedings.

Factual and Procedural Background

The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ross Milling Co. v. GilibertiLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
  2. Sessions & Fishman v. Liquid Air Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  3. Ascension Builders, Inc. v. JumonvilleSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1972
  4. Helwick v. Montgomery Ventures Ltd.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1995
  5. Sudds v. Protective Cas. Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Drs. James and Amy Mautner Versus John Stone Ware, IV and Julia McClendon Ware; Keypoint Home Inspections, L.L.C. and Peter Barilaro; And All Pest Exterminators, Inc. and Dean L. SagerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2020
  2. Jerry M. Guillory, II v. Stafford WilliamsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API