State v. Beckman
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
WAHL, Justice.
Defendant was charged with aggravated robbery, Minn.Stat. § 609.245 (1982). After the trial court denied his motion to suppress his confession and other evidence on constitutional grounds, defendant waived his right to a trial by jury and agreed to let the trial court determine his guilt on the basis of stipulated facts, thereby preserving his right to raise the suppression issues on appeal without putting the state and himself through the time and expense of a trial. State v. Lothenbach, 296 N.W.2d 854 (1980). The trial court found defendant guilty as charged and sentenced him…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Dunaway v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. ScottSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- State v. ThaggardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- State v. ClarkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- State of Minnesota v. Thomas James FoxSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.