Cangelosi v. Our Lady of the Lake Regional Medical Center
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
WATKINS, Judge.
This appeal presents the question of whether or not a refusal to give an instruction on res ipsa loquitur in a medical malpractice case usurps the province of the jury. After all the evidence was presented, the trial judge considered the evidence and made a determination that the doctrine was not applicable. The action of the trial *91judge was pursuant to the mandate of LSA-R.S. 9:2794(C).
We agree with appellants that the statute operates to establish a dichotomous decision-making process: first, the trial judge; then, the jury. But appellants’ objection to the process belongs in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gonzales v. Xerox Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
- Morgan v. Willis-Knighton Medical CenterLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1984
- Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. v. RothmanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
- Bryan v. VarnadoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1981
- Rogers v. BrownLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cangelosi v. OUR LADY OF LAKE REG. MED. CTR.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1990
- Cangelosi v. Our Lady of Lake Regional Medical CenterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989