Legal Opinion

Chicago, Peoria & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Blume

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1891PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Madison county; the Hon. William H. Snyder, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Magruder

This is a proceeding, begun by the appellant Company in the Circuit Court of Madison County on October 3, 1889, for the condemnation of a strip of land, sixty feet wide, running through appellee’s farm. The appellee filed a cross-petition for damages to the contiguous land not taken. Verdict and judgment in the trial court were in favor of defendant below for $265.06 for the land taken, and $1472.00 for the land not taken.

Appellant objects to the answer of one of defendant’s witnesses as being improper. The question, in reply to which the answer was given, was perfectly proper and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Beasley v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Keithsburg & Eastern Railroad v. HenryIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Wickenkamp v. WickenkampIllinois Supreme Court · 1875

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. St. Louis, El Reno & Western Railway Co. v. OliverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906
  2. Schoolfield v. WitkowskiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1964
  3. Trunkline Gas Co. v. O'BRYANIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Beaumont & G. N. R. R. v. ElliottCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  5. The People v. CarsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API