Citizens National Trust & Savings Bank v. Blank
California Court of Appeal
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
NOUESE (Paul), J. pro tern.,* Dissenting.
I concur in
the majority opinion insofar as it holds that the so-called second codicil was executed and witnessed in the manner required by law.
I dissent from the majority opinion insofar as it holds that the evidence herein is sufficient to uphold a finding that the original will and first codicil were in existence at the time of the testator’s death, and I am further of the opinion that the findings of the trial court are so conflicting as not to constitute in fact a finding that said will and codicil were in existence at the time of the testator’s…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Gorman v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- In Re Estate of JohnstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Moramarco v. MoramarcoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Estate of RonayneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.