Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Citizens National Trust & Savings Bank v. Blank

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 6, 1955No. Civ. No. 21004Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

NOUESE (Paul), J. pro tern.,* Dissenting.

I concur in

the majority opinion insofar as it holds that the so-called second codicil was executed and witnessed in the manner required by law.

I dissent from the majority opinion insofar as it holds that the evidence herein is sufficient to uphold a finding that the original will and first codicil were in existence at the time of the testator’s death, and I am further of the opinion that the findings of the trial court are so conflicting as not to constitute in fact a finding that said will and codicil were in existence at the time of the testator’s…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Gorman v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  3. In Re Estate of JohnstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Moramarco v. MoramarcoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Estate of RonayneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API