Aatrix Software, Inc. v. Green Shades Software, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion concurring-in-part, dissenting-in-part filed by Circuit Judge REYNA .
Moore, Circuit Judge.
Aatrix Software, Inc. ("Aatrix") appeals the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida's dismissal under Rule 12(b)(6), in which the district court held claims 1, 2, and 22 of U.S. Patent No. 7,171,615 ("'615 patent") and claims 1, 13, and 17 of U.S. Patent No. 8,984,393 ("'393 patent") invalid as directed to ineligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101 . Aatrix also appeals the district court's denial of its motion for leave to file a second amended complaint. We vacate…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Enfish, LLC v. Microsoft CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by346 opinions
- SAP Am., Inc. v. InvestPic, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Cellspin Soft, Inc. v. Fitbit, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Chargepoint, Inc. v. Semaconnect, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Data Engine Technologies LLC v. Google LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Interval Licensing LLC v. Aol, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
341 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.