Legal Opinion
Keenan v. Martin
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 29, 1942PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Crapser, Heffernan, Schenck and Foster, JJ., concur; Hill, P. J., concurs solely upon the ground that mandamus may not be resorted to in matters of this kind. The petitioner is entitled to a total of seventeen and one-half days per month as compensation and commutation. (People ex rel. Hammond v. Martin, 261 App. Div. 648.) [See post, p. 1029.]
2Cases cited1 opinion
- People ex rel. Hammond v. MartinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
3Cited by1 opinion
- Quinn v. JacksonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946