Legal Opinion

Keenan v. Martin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 29, 1942PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Crapser, Heffernan, Schenck and Foster, JJ., concur; Hill, P. J., concurs solely upon the ground that mandamus may not be resorted to in matters of this kind. The petitioner is entitled to a total of seventeen and one-half days per month as compensation and commutation. (People ex rel. Hammond v. Martin, 261 App. Div. 648.) [See post, p. 1029.]

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People ex rel. Hammond v. MartinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Quinn v. JacksonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946