Walter v. Godshall
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Hudson, J., Fairfield, September, 1888. These were two actions, stated in the caption of the complaints as “George H. Walter and William J. McCormick, as copartners in trade, doing business under the firm name of George H. Walter & Co., plaintiffs, against S. C. Godshall, defendant.” The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Mr. Chtee Justice Simpson.
The plaintiffs, appellants, *188brought two separate actions against the defendant for certain indebtedness alleged to be due them by said defendant. The title or caption of these actions was as above, but the names of the individual members of the firm were not stated in the body of the complaint. Instead of this, it was simply stated therein “that at the time hereinafter mentioned, the plaintiffs were, and still are, copartners in trade, doing business under the firm name of Geo. IT. Walter & Co.,” which was followed by an…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Grist v. CaldwellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923