Legal Opinion
Griffin v. Burdine
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided November 20, 1953No. 34663PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtQuillian, J.
The general grounds of the motion for new trial are without merit. It is contended in these grounds that the plaintiff’s evidence was so vacillating and uncertain that it did not amount to positive proof of any fact, and for this reason was not sufficient to support the verdict. Burdine’s testimony was positive and clear, except that he did not remember whether he received one automobile in December, 1946, or in January, 1947. It was reasonably apparent from his testimony that he was testifying that the automobile was for the year 1947. While he testified he could not remember whether he…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Brown v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
- Steele v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- A. C. Alexander Lumber Co. v. BagleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
- Sutton v. FordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
- Southern Railway Co. v. WilcoxCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mrs. Mae Hester Bohannon v. Manhattan Life Insurance Company, Defendant-Third-Party v. Jackson's Atlanta Ready Mix Concrete Company, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Moore v. Emery (In Re American Steel Product, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Georgia · 1996
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1962