Legal Opinion
Zito v. People
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided April 20, 1908No. Gen. No. 13,775PublishedCited by 1 opinion
Action to recover penalty for sale of cocaine. Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Arnold Heap, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Adams
The following is the bill of particulars:
“Plaintiff’s action is to recover a penalty for the sale of cocaine, to wit: hydro-chlorate, to wit: a preparation containing cocaine, made on, to wit: the seventeenth day of November, A. D. 1906, at the city of Chicago, without then and there having the written prescription of a licensed physician or a licensed dentist licensed under the laws of the state of Illinois, in violation of the provisions of paragraphs 32A and 32B, chapter 91, of the Revised Statutes of the State of Illinois, being section 14A and 14B of an Act entitled, ‘An Act to regulate…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wiggins v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
- Kettles v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
- Kennedy v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
- People ex rel. Brennan v. CottonIllinois Supreme Court · 1853
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. ZitoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1908