Legal Opinion

Boaz v. McChesney

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1876PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From the Marion Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBiddle, J.

Suit on a promissory note, not negotiable by the law merchant, secured by mortgage, brought by the appellee against the appellant. The note was payable to the order of James M. Ray, executor of Jeremiah McChesney, deceased, endorsed by the payee to Sarah G. McChesney, and by her to G. G. McChesney, who endorsed it to the appellee. The answer to the complaint will sufficiently show the facts upon which the only question contested in. the case arises.

“ Naomi J. Boaz, defendant, for answer to the complaint in the above entitled cause, says that on the 10th day of August, 1867, Jeremiah…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Clarke v. HenshawIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Martin v. BeasleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Headrick v. WisehartIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Foltz v. PetersIndiana Supreme Court · 1861

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Burns v. GavinIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Beach v. BellIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Crum v. MeeksIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Massey v. JerauldIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API