Legal Opinion

Project Builders, Inc. v. Zeiders

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County

Decided March 17, 1969No. 527Published

1Opinion of the Court

Shelley, J.,

This matter is before us on (1) defendants’ rule to show cause why an award entered by an arbitrator should not be va*143cated and the matter remanded for trial in the common pleas court of this county, and (2) plaintiffs motion to modify the award, confirm the same and direct judgment to be entered for plaintiff and against defendants.

Plaintiff filed an answer to defendants’ rule, which answer averred in new matter that this court has no jurisdiction to review the award of the arbitrator. Defendants replied to the new matter.

Defendants filed an answer to plaintiffs motion to modify…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Harwitz v. Selas Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  2. Wingate Construction Co. v. Schweizer Dipple, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  3. Keller v. Local 249 of International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  4. Continental Milling & Feed Co. v. Doughnut Corp. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
  5. Owens v. Concord Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API