Micks v. Norton
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPotter, J.
Plaintiff brought suit against defendant to recover damages for personal injuries suffered' by plaintiff’s intestate, resulting from his being hit by an automobile alleged to have been negligently driven by one John Skoglund employed by defendant in his garage where the automobile in question had been placed for repairs; it being operated by Skoglund in testing it at the time of the accident. Plaintiff’s intestate died as a result of his injuries. The negligence charged against defendant, legally responsible for the acts of Skoglund, was: Driving the automobile in the business district of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Love v. Detroit, Jackson & Chicago RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
- Olivier v. Houghton County Street-Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1903
- Budnick v. PetersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
- Johnson v. City of Bay CityMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- Swaczyk v. Detroit Edison Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1919
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Baker v. AltMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
- Crook v. EckhardtMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
- Tyler v. WeedMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
- Anderson v. Jersey Creamery Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936
- Janse v. HaywoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.