Legal Opinion

In re Proving the Last Will & Testament of Rohe

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided January 15, 1898PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Proceedings upon probate of will.

1Opinion of the Court

Marcus, S.

The testimony offered by the contestants leaves for the determination of the court the sanity of the testatrix ; also whether undue influence was practiced upon her.

The will and codicil of Mary E. Rohe, which are the subject of this contest, were made on the 9th of August, 1888, and the 16th of January, 1894, respectively. She. was of the age of seventy-three years at the time of making the will, and of the age of seventy-nine years when she executed the codicil. Her only relatives were nephews and nieces — fourteen in all. In her will and codicil ten were mentioned to a larger or…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Buchanan v. PierieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
  2. In re the Revocation of Probate of the Last Will & Testament of MurphyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  3. Doheny v. LacyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  4. In re Probate of the Will of MurphyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1895
  5. In re Hawley's WillNew York Surrogate's Court · 1904

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API