Legal Opinion

Schlueter v. Health Care Plan, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 18, 1992No. Appeal No. 1Published

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously reversed on the law *953without costs and motion granted. Memorandum: On the record before us, we conclude that Health Care Plan, Inc. (Health Care), the owner of the construction project, is entitled to conditional summary judgment against A.D.F. Construction (A.D.F.), the general contractor, for contractual and common-law indemnification. The contract between Health Care and A.D.F. contains an indemnification clause sufficient to impose liability upon A.D.F. for indemnification (see, Public Adm’r of Bronx County v Trump Vil. Constr. Corp., 177 AD2d 258; Pietsch v Moog, Inc.,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Conway v. New York State Teachers' Retirement SystemAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  2. Pietsch v. Moog, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  3. Public Administrator v. Trump Village Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  4. Schlueter v. Health Care Plan, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API