Legal Opinion

Haney v. Union Foundry Co.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided March 1, 1996No. 2940876PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

THIGPEN, Judge.

In September 1993, Eddie Haney filed a complaint, seeking workmen’s compensation benefits, alleging that he was permanently disabled because of a lower back injury that he had sustained while working in the line and scope of his employment with Union Foundry Company (employer) in 1991.1 The employer answered, and, among other things, denied that Haney was permanently disabled, and asserted several affirmative defenses.

Following ore tenus proceedings in October 1994, the trial court concluded that Haney had suffered an 8% permanent partial impairment, and it awarded benefits…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ex Parte MurraySupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  2. Marley Erectors, Inc. v. RiceCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1990
  3. International Paper Co. v. MurrayCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1985
  4. Wheeler v. LAKE FOREST PROPERTY OWNERS'Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1988
  5. Cook v. MunnCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Billingsley v. City of GadsdenCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API