Legal Opinion
In Re Gerstenzang
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 4, 1931PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PATTERSON, District Judge.
Louis Gerstenzang and Abraham Gerstenzang, brothers, were formerly partners in the artificial flower business. Dissensions arose and Abraham pulled out. Louis brought suit in the New York Supreme Court, asking that the partnership be declared dissolved, that an accounting be had, and that the amount due him by reason of alleged withdrawals on the part of Abraham be determined. An interlocutory judgment was entered, granting this relief and sending the matter of the account and withdrawals to a referee. After a number of hearings, the referee reported on July 3, 1931,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Marnet Oil & Gas Co. v. StaleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1914
- In re RosensteinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
- In re Ennis & StoppaniDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1909
- In re BuchananCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914
- In re Seattle North Pacific Shipbuilding Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1924
3Cited by7 opinions
- Litton Systems, Inc. v. Frigitemp Corp. (In Re Frigitemp Corp.)District Court, S.D. New York · 1981
- In Re Keene Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- Jessie v. Honosky (In Re Honosky)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1980
- Kaufman-Brown Potato Co. v. LongCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
- Benitez v. Bank of Nova ScotiaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1940
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.