Legal Opinion
United States v. Armco Steel Corporation
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided September 17, 1971No. Civ. A. 70-H-1335PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION:
HANNAY, District Judge.
This suit was instituted by the United States against the Armco Steel Corporation to permanently enjoin it from discharging certain effluent wastes into the Houston Ship Channel, Harris County, Texas. With subject matter jurisdiction predicated on Title 28, U.S.C.A., Section 1345 in the original complaint, the United States charges Armco with violation of Title 33, United States Code Annotated, Section 407, Section 13 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899, and urges its claimed remedy here under the authority of Title 33, United States Code…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Hurn v. OurslerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- United States v. Republic Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Alexander v. HillmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- United States v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States Steel Corp. v. TrainCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- E. I. Dupont De Nemours & Company v. Russell E. Train, as Administrator of the Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Ira S. Bushey & Sons, Inc.District Court, D. Vermont · 1973
- United States v. Rohm & Haas Company and Rohm & Haas of Texas, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. Gaf CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1975
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.