Legal Opinion · Concurrence
Warren Consolidated Schools v. Froling
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided October 28, 1970No. Docket No. 7,043Published
1ConcurrenceHolbrook, J.
This writer agrees with the majority opinion in the result, but believes it lielpful to explain the reasons for concurrence. For this purpose it is deemed advisable to relate a part of the proceedings pertinent to this appeal, vis.:
“Mr. Scott (for defendant Froling): The only item I have is in regard to the form of the verdict, which I approved before I took a look at it, in regard to the question of the amount of land to be taken. I don’t think there is anything, it recites the total, but I do not think necessarily the jury needs to find the total. There is no portion in there which would…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State Highway Commissioner v. SnellMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967