Pima Gro Systems, Inc. v. King George County Board of Supervisors
King George County Circuit Court
1Opinion of the Court
By Judge William H. Ledbetter, Jr.
The dispositive issue in this declaratory judgment action involves the enforceability of an agreement made by the County with an individual landowner, the plaintiffs’ predecessor-in-interest, wherein the landowner was permitted to engage in activity prohibited by the County zoning ordinance.
For the reasons explained below, the court is of the opinion that the agreement is void and unenforceable.
Facts
Pima Gro is in the business of removing treated sewage (“sludge” or “biosolids”) from municipal treatment plants and applying it to agricultural land. There are…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mumpower v. Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Virginia · 1940
- Westminster-Canterbury of Hampton Roads, Inc. v. City of Virginia BeachSupreme Court of Virginia · 1989
- County of York v. King's Villa, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1983
- Warner Co. v. SuttonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
- Laird v. City of DanvilleSupreme Court of Virginia · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.