Legal Opinion

Pima Gro Systems, Inc. v. King George County Board of Supervisors

King George County Circuit Court

Decided May 10, 2000No. Case No. CH99-57Published

1Opinion of the Court

By Judge William H. Ledbetter, Jr.

The dispositive issue in this declaratory judgment action involves the enforceability of an agreement made by the County with an individual landowner, the plaintiffs’ predecessor-in-interest, wherein the landowner was permitted to engage in activity prohibited by the County zoning ordinance.

For the reasons explained below, the court is of the opinion that the agreement is void and unenforceable.

Facts

Pima Gro is in the business of removing treated sewage (“sludge” or “biosolids”) from municipal treatment plants and applying it to agricultural land. There are…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mumpower v. Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Virginia · 1940
  2. Westminster-Canterbury of Hampton Roads, Inc. v. City of Virginia BeachSupreme Court of Virginia · 1989
  3. County of York v. King's Villa, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1983
  4. Warner Co. v. SuttonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
  5. Laird v. City of DanvilleSupreme Court of Virginia · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API